PEP Benchmark #3

P.E.P. Technology vs Bysoft Benchmark Analysis Developed by Measurement Masters, Inc. 1 Technology Drive, Suite D-401 Irvine, CA 92618 Corporate: (949) 753-7878 Fax: (949) 753-8585E-mail: info@peptechnology.com Automatic Nesting Comparison # Subject P.E.P. Bysoft Comments P.E.P. Savings 1 Plates nested 10.1 11.75 P.E.P.’s results produced in one attempt 14% of material ! 2 Programs (unique nests) 6 7 Duplicated nests allow same plate to be cut 3 Plates loaded 11 12 P.E.P. 5min? plate load 4 Automatic nesting time 5 min. ? P.E.P.’s total time, no re-nesting required 5 Common cutting 2,387 0 Parts nested at kerf automatically $39.75 6 Head raises 2008 4622 Head stays down between cutouts SAFELY $72.42 7 Short line segments replaced ALL Some SEE SECTION ON SHORT LINE SEGMENTS 1 million plus P.E.P. AUTOMATIC NESTING RESULTS BYSOFT AUTOMATIC NESTING RESULTS COMMON CUT & H.R. SAVINGS = $112.17 The savings of 2,387 inches means $39.75 worth of laser time is saved to cut more billing. P.E.P. safely keeps the laser head down from cutout to cutout and part to part an AVERAGE of 90% of the time. A typical Head Raise time of 1 second = hundreds of hours given back to cut more parts every year.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODIyMjQ=